A-Z Challenge 2020 – Specialised Studies A is for Agriculture and Farms

Specialised Studies

Created by Julie Goucher using wordclouds.com March 2020

A great many genealogists have agricultural labourers in their families; and the same can be said of those with a One-Name study.  The focus is not going to be on the individuals necessarily, but opportunities to research the employment of the labourers and their methods of working. You might be researching the Farms themselves or just wanting to add context to the lives of our ancestors and their peers.

The British Agricultural History Society has a very informative website and if you look under the menu of search and then scroll to the bottom to find rural museums you are presented with a list of venues to visit with a link to their websites. The option of searching for other societies also provides more links, including one site that is about carrots!

I am from the south east of England as were the majority of my maternal family going back generations. One such venue, linked from the venue’s list above, was Gilbert White’s House and Gardens at Selbourne which is relatively close to the villages on the Surrey and Hampshire border where my Harris, Holt, Elstone, Budd and Bridger families lived, some of whom worked and owned a paper mill and did not work the land.

(As I was writing this post I noticed that Gilbert’s wife had Holt as her maiden name, so that is now added to my to do list!).

Natural History of Selborne

Gilbert White is also well known for his book, The Natural History of Selbourne which was published in 1798. The copy shown here is with the most recent cover by Penguin, my copy is around 30 years old and has a different cover. The book itself though can be read and downloaded online from HERE, free of charge.

The Museum of English Rural Life which is part of the University of Reading is also an interesting place to visit in the physical sense but to explore online too with the search and browse feature of the collection. There is also material on the Women’s Land Army from the Second World War which can be located here.

I was educated in the south east of England and one venue that was a frequent destination for school trips was an open museum. Originally it was known as Singleton open air museum, though now it is known as Weald and Downland Museum. I had not been back for years, though we organised a visit about five years or so ago. The reason for the visit was to see the watermill in particular.

The watermill was originally located at Lurgashall in Sussex, which was the very place my great, great Grandmother, Mary Elstone, nee Denyer (1838-1913) was born and lived in. She would have, without a doubt, seen this exact mill in operation. To stand in front of something that she would have seen in operation as she went about her activities in the village was something very special and I was very glad to have made the journey. The museum has a library and the catalogue can be searched HERE and you can also see the museum magazines online.

The museum has a Farming and Livestock section on their website, so it is possible to see a glimpse of what farm work was like in the time of our ancestors. If you would like to see a map of the museum, you can do so here and the watermill is located at C9

There are lots of opportunities to undertake specialised studies – farms, places and even perhaps water mills! By working on a specialised study, even in the short term, means we can explore the history and context of the places, farm, work etc of our ancestors, thereby adding some flesh to the bones of our people.

Taking part in the A-Z Challenge for 2020

Posted in A-Z Challenge 2020 - Specialised Studies, Genealogy, One-Name Studies, One-Place Studies, Specialised Studies | 9 Comments

Q & A – Citations and Repositories

Q & A

Created by Julie Goucher – Feb 2020 Using Wordclouds.com

Hi Julie, I enjoyed the online Chat and just read the evening one so have ordered the book mentioned.

I’ve managed to get RootsMagic to work on my Mac – I don’t think it will link to anything online but. For the time being I will use this to start inputting my X records.

So, a question for you please? downloaded a lot from Durham Records Online so want to credit them with the information, is that what I should be doing? I really want to get source information right from the start but am puzzling about how to add the following to RootsMagic.

I have removed the identifying details from this part of the email I received. I have already answered, but though that I would share the response here in case it was of interest.

The majority of software, which includes Roots Magic is that the pre-loaded information is referring to material from the United States. The way I navigated this issue was to use the free text information and created my own information, and in doing so was perhaps vague, but vague for a reason.

Rather than list all the possible records, so there were multiple entries for Parish Records, I record baptisms, marriages and burials as Parish Records and then use the Repository option for any details. The other reason for recording in this way is that some of my research occurred before the internet and therefore I physically went to the archives and look at the actual register or used a microfilm of the register. In some of those cases I paid for copies of entries or the page. In the modern era, we can access material online, the source stays the same, but the medium for the access has changed.

Just recently I was working on something that related to my family in Surrey. I recorded the record like this:

Puttenham, Surrey, England – Parish Records. SHC (Surrey History Centre) PSH/PUT/… accessed via Ancestry 26 March 2020, accessed via the register at Guildford Muniment Room April 1990.

Whilst Ancestry is not a repository in the strict meaning of the word, it is more relevant to record it as that, than as a source. Ancestry (and any of the other providers) do not own the documents, what they have is a license to digitise them and in some cases the license may be revoked or not be renewed and switch to another provider, simply in the course of normal business practice rather than because of anything inappropriate.

I am of the view that I would rather a brief citation than no citation. I have a bit of citation tidying to do, which I hope to achieve later this year. Like with anything, it is always good to reflect on practice and see if a change is required. I wrote earlier about Citations and Sources and you can find those posts HERE

Posted in Genealogy, Q & A, Sources & Citations Series | Leave a comment

Introducing A-Z Challenge 2020

Specialised Studies

Commencing 1st April, subscribers and readers will be seeing posts every day (apart from Sunday) about Specialised Studies.

A specialised study is a project or study based upon something specific. Each of the posts will be based upon the loose theme of genealogy and local history, each one accompanied by at least one resource that you might find useful, whether or not you are focusing on the actual study shown. For those working on a One-Name Study you should find the series useful as it will give you further opportunities to search for individuals!

Over the course of the month, we shall meander through the alphabet, starting with A on 1st and ending with Z on 30th, by which time I shall likely be in need of a rest!

I hope you enjoy the series and please, do comment!

Posted in A-Z Challenge 2020 - Specialised Studies, Genealogy, One-Name Studies, One-Place Studies, Specialised Studies | 4 Comments

Q & A – Study Starting Point

Q & A

Created by Julie Goucher – Feb 2020 Using Wordclouds.com

Hi Julie, I have collected some Census information, Marriages and Cemetery Records for my one name study. I would like to start entering individuals into Roots Magic. The marriages have spouses and marriage dates but no age or parents for the early marriages.

Would you suggest I begin with Census, marriage, or cemetery records? Once I enter an individual or married couple should I enter all of the information I can find about this person/couple from all my sources? Or stick to one set of data at a time and add all the individuals in that source before adding other information from other sources? I’m itching to begin playing with Roots Magic.

This was a question posted to me via email. I have removed the individual’s name, so they cannot be identified and whilst I did answer the question privately I thought I would also share it here. Firstly, there is NO right or wrong way to start entering data into your program of choice.

I responded by saying that I would start with a marriage of an individual. I then went on and said that I would likely continue with marriages, but sometimes it is useful to flesh the married couple out further, either as individuals or as a couple. Regardless on the method you choose, sometimes there are individuals whether in your own family or not, study or not, who are just interesting for whatever reason and then you want to flesh out their lives using material across a variety of data-sets.

As long as you keep a log of what you have done, you will not waste time or repeat work.

I also commented to try both methods, so enter a few marriages then switch to entering a couple where you flesh out their details. Which way seems the most natural to you? Once you know the answer to that then you will be off to a flying start. Remember though, you can change your methodology when it suits you. Just remember to cite sources and make notes in your research log and your to do list.

Posted in Introduction to One-Name Studies (Pharos course 901), One-Name Studies, Practicalities of a One-Name Studies (Pharos Course 903), Q & A | Leave a comment

Desk Ramblings (28)

Desk Ramblings

Created by Julie Goucher, July 2019

I am not planning on turning this post into a discussion on COVID-19 because discussions are everywhere; and not all of it accurate.

I am a news junkie, so I watched the news very frequently last week. Because of a health condition I am classed as “vulnerable” as is my  husband, so we were advised to practice self isolation and if we did go out to practice social distancing. By the end of last week the situation had changed and the Country was told that individuals should stay home, only venturing out for essentials. Then, over the weekend, we went a stage further. It was a directive to stay home. Pictures filled our news screens of jammed packed tube trains as people ignored the sensible directive to stay home.

Covid19

Courtesy  – NHS England 2019

My mind turned to the Influenza Pandemic of 1918, also known as Spanish Flu, where 500 million people were infected. I have no idea how my family felt of the situation as there is no written word in our family papers and no one is left to ask. That is of course, different to future generations of my family, because I have made numerous references in my journal.

So, whilst we are locked down, not allowed out apart from essentials and for exercise I have been keeping busy, doing an assortment of tasks and writing – rather too much of the former and less than I would like of the latter. My office is still a room in transition from when we moved here 18 months ago. I have been reorganising a few things, though I use the word reorganising rather loosely!

Carver Box

Curver Boxes 2016

It started about three weeks ago when someone wrote to me about a Butcher family in my part of Surrey. I read the email and recognised the names. I went to the filing cabinet and located the file marked Butcher.

It was bulging and there was a note, written by me, directing a future me, as the note had been written in 2016, to a Curver lidded container with a picture of a Highland Terrier, where I would find more Butcher material. I looked for the box and there it was located next to my comfy chair where I had placed a stack of folders on top and behind a stack of books for some reorganisation. I set about moving the material. After an hour, I had accessed the box, and gone through the contents. The material in the box is Butcher material to be digitised or added to my study, except the item I wanted was not in the box. After a couple of hours, after sorting a few assorted piles of paper that was awaiting filing, I had not found the paper. I was being to panic – I recalled the last day I had the paper, it was recycling day, had I put the paper in the wrong place?

At 3 am the following morning, I was up early and heading to the bathroom, when I recalled where I had put the paper. My iPad case has a slip pocket in the front and I do have a few papers in there. I tiptoed into the bedroom opened the drawer next to my side of the bed and extracted said iPad. Making my way to my office I put the light on, sat down and extracted a few sheets of paper, including the sheet I had spent considerable time seeking the day before. The moral of this story is always put away papers you get out.

“Be a filer, not a piler!”

The latest Pharos course on One-Name studies started last week, just as I shared  a day or so ago. That is going well and I am keenly awaiting feedback and comments from the first cohort of students.

The only other news is that I came across a notebook series made by Moleskine a year or so ago, smaller than the usual size and a mixture of plain and ruled paper, the latter is on the right of the notebook. It also has less pages. I ordered one and eventually began using it, finishing it at the end of last week.

Next up, is another Moleskine, and this time I have opted for the Moleskine expanded (400 pages) and in plain paper. As my planner is also Moleskine and I use the same pens as usual (Uniball Eye), I was disappointed to see the paper is a little different, in that there is ghosting on the reverse page. I am six pages in, so for 394 pages I am going to be driven crazy unless I switch pens (not going to happen!), so I had best get use to the paper & ghosting. In case anyone wants to see this, here is the option that I bought, but I notice the price has significantly increased from the £17 I paid. On further checking I see the price on Amazon mirrors that on the UK Moleskine.

I am hoping to have another post up later, after I have dealt with a few domestic chores whilst the sun is shining!

Stay safe everyone!

 

Posted in Desk Ramblings! | 3 Comments

Practicalities of a One-Name Study

spreadsheetWe have just got to the end of week one of the new Pharos course, Practicalities of a One-Name Study

The first week looks at, as you might have guessed, spreadsheets and how they can be used in a One-Name study and used for the right task.

Anyone who has read this blog, attended a surname research based lecture or took the Introduction to One-Name Studies course, will know how I use spreadsheets, what my starting point is and so forth.

One thing I do not use them for, is for designing genealogical trees and whilst some do use a spreadsheet for this purpose, I am way to impatient to be one of those researchers and I admire those that do indeed have the patience.

That said, I do use spreadsheets for some interesting tasks and over the coming weeks I may well share them here! If you are interested in taking this course in the future, please click the Enquire about this course feature from the bottom of the course link. No other dates are listed as yet, but I expect to agree some later on, once the first course completes, once I have reviewed the comments and feedback.

Posted in One-Name Studies, Practicalities of a One-Name Studies (Pharos Course 903) | Leave a comment

Q & A – Consistency in Recording Place Names

Q & A

Created by Julie Goucher – Feb 2020 Using Wordclouds.com

For researchers not use to researching in England and Wales it is worth pointing our some inconsistencies when researching and recording place names

Firstly, in England and Wales births, marriages and deaths were recorded from September 1837. They were recorded in quarters – March, June, September and December. (Births that took place in December could in fact miss the recording and appear in the March quarter of the previous year.)

The recordings, in their quarters were done in district orders. My maternal Grandfather for example was born 3rd March 1908. I have this information from his birth certificate. His baptism took place in Flexford, which was a Hamlet next to Wanborough Surrey, some four miles from Guildford, Surrey, England.

Meanwhile, he was baptised when he was two months old at Wanborough Church, Wanborough in Surrey.

George Butcher - Baptism 1908

Baptism Record, Wanborough, Surrey, England – George Butcher May 1908

His entry in the General Registrar Office of Births reads as this:

Name: George Butcher
Registration Year: 1908
Registration Quarter: Apr-May-Jun
Registration district: Guildford
Parishes for this Registration District: View Ecclesiastical Parishes associated with this Registration District
Inferred County: Surrey
Volume: 2a
Page: 111

The Ecclesiastical parishes include these parishes:

Albury, Guildford St Nicholas, Ripley, Merrow, Send, Godalming, East and West Horsley, Guildford Holy Trinity, Wisley, Pirbright, Compton, Woking, Wanborough, Stoke and Worplesdon.

(courtesy of Ancestry)

The only way to identify the actual event is to order the birth certificate and pay the fee of around £11. Alternatively, trawl through the parish records for the various parishes and hopefully finding the information. Of course, these days it is relatively easy to login to Ancestry, use the search filters as I have done here and locate the actual venue. Back in 1990, I did the search the hard way, working through the parishes.

In my database, the event is recorded twice:

  1. Baptism, St Bartholomew Church, Wanborough Surrey, England – 3rd May 1909
  2. Birth, Guildford Registration District, General Registrar Office,  England & Wales June Quarter 1908, Volume 2a and page 111

This postcard is of St Bartholomew Church, Wanborough, Surrey, England circa 1910 From the personal collection of Julie Goucher.

It is very important to record the venue and list the County and Country because a number of places in the UK have the same name and going a step further, a great many places outside of the UK also have the same name. By using consistent recording of locations, it is much easier to retrace your steps should you or anyone else need to.

Posted in England, Genealogy, One-Name Studies, Q & A, UK & Ireland (Eire) Genealogy Series, Wales | Leave a comment

More on Variants

Variants & Deviants

Designed by Julie Goucher using wordclouds.com ~ March 2020

The latest Introduction to One-Name Studies course has just officially finished, though I shall arrange one more chat with those students. One of the things I love about teaching the courses, is the questions posed over the duration of the course. Those questions are always answered during the course, but often, I bring the question here, either in the format I have used today, or by addressing the question in narrative.

This is an abridged questions posed by student, (JS)  which I have adjusted slightly, as otherwise, it would be possible to identify the student.

However I think there may be a large number of variants.
How do you know how far the variants should extend.
Also what are the dangers with such small numbers.

Here is a slightly tweaked response:

I think the way to look at variants is to be guided by the records you locate.

When I registered Butcher, I did so with no variants. I did however, record instances of Butchers. For about a year they remained as completely separate databases, then I looked at the divorce records on Ancestry. There were several Butcher records, as I read one of them, it transpired that the divorce was recorded as a Butcher because that was how the marriage was registered, but the man was actually a Butchers.

The divorce record provided the marriage certificate and that confirmed that the marriage was recorded as a Butcher rather than a Butchers. I immediately merged the GRO Marriages for Butchers into the Butcher spreadsheet and did the same with the GEDCOM, merBefore adding any variant to a study I would recommend assessing the numbers that might be involved.ging Butchers with the Butcher file. I then recognised that the study would reflect both names and noted the fact that the instances of Butchers was in actual decline, likely that the name dropped the S on the end, becoming Butcher.

Small numbers might show varying things:

1. Define the geographical spread for small numbers – Orlando is small in England and Wales but not the case in Italy and the US.

2. Small numbers might be indicative of migration. One student who had a reference to the surname of Ganselem in the family stated that there was no instances in any of the origins books. In my reply to that I said the surname sounded Jewish, based upon nothing more than a hunch. I then looked at JewishGen and did a search for the surname which did reveal some instances.

3, Small numbers can only identify a surname in decline. It might therefore be useful to conduct an assessment of births, are there high mortality numbers? are their large numbers of females born who largely change their surname upon marriage?

Knowing the origins will perhaps influence, and in some regard. depend on your search options and those parameters.

Ganselem Distribution

Ganselem distribution from Forebears.io

As I pulled together this post I had a quick look at Forebears to see what their distribution map showed, there was one patch identified, as Mongolia with 245 individuals in 2014.

There are a couple of points:

  1. The surname has a representation according to Forebears, as given name.
  2. What has driven the only instance of the surname to show Mongolia

The Introduction to One-Name Studies course (901) is set to begin on 2 June 2020.

Posted in Genealogy, One-Name Studies | 2 Comments

The Genealogy Blog Party: Celebrating Women’s History Month

56957-caroline2526girls

Caroline Harris (nee Ellis) with four of her daughters – from the personal collection of Julie Goucher

This photograph is one of my most treasured photographs. The lady sitting down is my Great Great Grandmother, Caroline Harris nee Ellis. According to my great Aunts, who were Caroline’s grandchildren she was a formidable lady. She did not suffer fools gladly and took no nonsense from anyone.

Caroline was born in 1844 to George Ellis and Prudence Budd. She was baptised in Puttenham as indeed were generations of my family on 20 October 1844. On the Census records from 1861 until 1891, Caroline repeatedly states she was born in neighbouring Elstead, which is entirely plausible given the proximity to Puttenham and there were a great many Ellis families in the immediate area.

Caroline was one of a eight children born to George and Prudence, who had married on 16 October 1834. Her mother died in 1855 aged 37 years when her youngest brother, James was just three years old. To date I have not established if indeed her father remarried and I should do so.  Caroline married Henry Harris on 3 December 1864 and together they had ten children born between 1864 and 1885. The first was Emma Jane, born just before her parents marriage and baptised in November that same year. Henry died in 1929 aged 86 years and Caroline in 1935 aged 91 years.

To return to focus on the photograph. The women behind Caroline are four of her daughters, some of whom equally were known for their longevity. The lady on the left is my Great Grandmother, Annie Prudence Harris (1879-1972). I am lucky to remember my Great Grandmother, who is affectionately known as APH in my own notebooks. Of course by the time I recall her she was a very elderly lady, largely confined to bed and living with her eldest daughter, my Grandfather’s sister.

I remember being allowed to walk up the stairs, which of course seemed very steep to me as a three year old. My Grandfather on some occasions carried me from the bottom of the stairs, on other occasions, he picked me up when he sensed that my little legs were getting tired. On those visits, I was placed on the bed, next to APH and allowed to snuggle in, she smelt of lavender and always gave me the biggest hug and cuddle that any three year old could want. Her hair tied back in a bun, grey with faint strands falling from it. APH loved pineapple and no visit was every made without one!

By this time, APH had been a widow since 1943, almost 30 years which seems tragic. It is hard to imagine her as a young women courting and eventually marrying my Great Grandfather, Charles Butcher. They married on Christmas Eve 1898 at Puttenham, having 12 children between 1900 and 1917, although just nine lived to adulthood. The youngest daughter, Marjorie was just 35 when she died in 1952 leaving behind a husband and daughter. Three others died as infants. Charles Harry was born blind and lived just five months in 1902,  Frederick William was stillborn in 1903 and then Elsie was born in 1912 and lived just two months, she sadly died of convulsions. There is a resilience that runs deep here and a determination to stand strong. Those strengths have continued to the modern generations, including to a certain former three year old!

The other three women in the photograph were Caroline’s daughters, Mabel, Rose and Kate. The closeness that the photograph exudes was fairly strong, the strengths of determination and even stubbornness ran deep despite the miles that separated the siblings, despite the second world war and other tragic circumstances. In writing this post, I note that there are a few outstanding pieces of research that I need to update into my genealogical software.

Mabel married and had a son and three daughters, all the daughters lived into their 90’s including the daughter who gave me this photograph. The son however, worked on the London docks and died as a result of an work related accident. Rose married and had two children, and not too much is known of her life, although I do know the family moved to the south coast. Kate, also married and had one child. She lived in the later years with the family at Manor Farm Guildford and died in 1958 after being hit by a car, crossing the main A3.

Having put this post together, it has highlighted that I have numerous omissions in my research, some still to undertake, others to incorporate from research visits. The sad thing is this is within living memory and unless it is recorded now, it will fade, like we will, into the past.

Taking part in the Genealogy Blog Party

Posted in Butcher One-Name Study, Genealogy Blog Party, Harris | 1 Comment

Scottish Highlands & Islands

UK and Ireland Series

Created using Wordclouds.com by Julie Goucher January 2020

Amazingly, there are 790 Scottish Islands, divided into four groups

  • Shetland
  • Orkney
  • Herbrides
    • Inner
    • Outer

As I researched this section I was astounded that there are so many islands. Then I pondered on the practical aspects, such as post and deliveries. No daily Amazon deliveries for sure!

There were also some quite amazing snippets that I came across.

  • The Island of Jura is in the Inner Hebrides and in the 2011 Census, there was 196 residents.
  • The Island of Rum, also in the Inner Hebrides has no “Indigenous residents“. The population of 22, are largely employees of Scottish Natural Heritage, who have owned the Island since 1957.
  • Farne Islands is located 200 miles north of Scotland and is an autonomous territory of Denmark.
  • Island of Rockall was declared by of Scotland by the Island of Rockall Act 1972. The legality of it is disputed by the Republic of Ireland, Denmark and Iceland which is likely to be unenforceable in International Law.
  • Flannan Isles was the location where three lighthouse keepers vanished in December 1900. I am fairly sure that I saw a film about this not too long ago, which used some degree of artistic license, since we do not actually know the fate of the three men who vanished.
  • Isle of Muck is a small island on the west coast and together with Eigg, Rum and Canna, forms the Small Isles. Muck measures 2 miles long by 1 mile wide and the island is home to approximately 40 people. The Island has been occupied since the Bronze Age. In 1821, the population was 320, fifteen years later many of the population had migrated to other parts of Scotland or emigrated completely to other countries. In 1836, sheep were introduced to the island, possibly in an attempt to provide work and food to the island. There is no mains electricity even today.

The Highland and Islands Emigration Society records have been released and are FREE to view on the ScotlandsPeople site HERE, though you do need to login (or create an account) to see the records. You can read some background reading, including all the Record Guide HERE

Posted in Scotland, Scottish Highlands and Islands, UK & Ireland (Eire) Genealogy Series | Leave a comment