Julie Goucher ~ Anglers Rest

Created by Julie Goucher, 2021 using Wordscloud

Over the last few days we have seen the details of Compton. We have seen how the village might have expanded and this post is to crunch the numbers, examining what they actually tell us.

At first glance the numbers are showing a gradual increase, in terms of property and families. That makes sense, if you grow your population they need somewhere to live, though there was minimal growth between 1801 and 1811; just 3 properties. No additional properties were built between 1811 and 1821 and then this significant growth between 1821 and 1831.

Despite the minimal property grown between 1801 and 1811, there was a population of 15 additional families, and that figure remains showing some growth. The gender split is not something that can be biologically determined at this point – essentially couples had no idea what sex their baby was to be until the point of delivery. To delve deeper into the numbers, around family groups and then how genders are reflected I need to spend time examining the baptisms, marriages and deaths.

Something else I want to look at is a map of the village and how that changed – did the village expand naturally or did the parish expand because of boundary changes? In addition to a map, I want to take a look at the Tithe Map – who owned the land in the parish?

Created by Julie Goucher, 2021 using wordscloud

We are familiar with the census form structures for 1841 onwards, and each decade the form undergoes changes.

The parish were sent copies of the parliamentary act and the schedule. This made it’s way to the Overseer of the Poor and then subsequently to the Officiating minister of the parish who was tasked with providing the number of births, marriages and deaths. Having made the official submissions, it depends on the incumbent if a copy or the details was retained.

The image below is from the Surrey parish of Compton. The page is from the parish register, where there are entries for births, marriages and deaths, and where the officiating clergy retained the information relating to the  1801 census – you can see a better copy of this below:

Compton Parish Records – Surrey History Centre; Woking, Surrey, England; Surrey Church of England Parish Registers; Reference: COM/1/2

Surrey History Centre; Woking, Surrey, England; Surrey Church of England Parish Registers; Reference: COM/1/2

As you can see, there is no individual specific data, but the information there is, enables us to have a snapshot of the village, which is replicated across subsequent census.

At first glance, it seems quite random that the rector would have chosen to have kept the information in this register,  until you understand the context of the questions asked and the individuals charged with providing the information, which we looked at in the first post in this series.

Created by Julie Goucher, 2021 using Wordscloud

One of the things that has been on my to do list for a while, is a series of blog posts about the census. Over the next few posts I am going to share about each of the census from 1801 up until the release of the 1921 census.

A census has taken place in the British Isles every decade since 1801 – You can see a full list of the census dates and associated information HERE.

The purpose of a census is generally speaking, a people count of those who are living in the country and where they are living.

That information and the breakdown of demographical facts enable several important factors to be established, here are a few of them:

• Of the population, how many are suitable candidates should there be a war
• Of the population, how many are candidates for the payment of taxes.
• Of the population in the location, was there growth?

The census questions between 1801 and 1831 was effectively in two parts and made up of six questions:

1. First three questions were to be addressed by the Overseers of the poor (or other substantial individual) and centred around the current population – the number of homes in the parish, along with if they were inhabited or not, the number of families and then the number of males and females. There was also a question about occupation, loosely divided into agriculture, manufacturing, commerce and lastly handicrafts.
2. The latter three questions were to be addressed by the clergy of the parish – based upon the births, marriages and deaths within the parish and recorded in the parish registers.

Over time, the questions asked of those in the household on the specified night changed as the government sought to find out specific demographical information from the population.

Each time the Government wished to undertake a census; it was required to be approved by Parliament who then approved the legislation which outlined the details of a specific census. This happened from 1801 with the Population Act 1800, every decade until 1920, when the Census Act made it possible for the Government to hold a census at any time, but not within five years of the previous census.

The census is a key document as we pursue our family history. It is also a significant resource for those undertaking a one-name study and one-place study.

A census enables us to identify one, or more persons and to follow them through the subsequent census returns, using the key identification measures, such as approximate age, place of birth, perhaps spouse or parents and children or siblings; even if you might need a little scope for those factors.

Those undertaking a specific study, as outlined above can also benefit from using census material.

With a place, especially a village or property, it is relatively easy to extract the entire location, across each census, building a portfolio of the demographical group of the location for example. Many years ago, I did an complete extraction of the census, from 1841-1891 for the village of Puttenham in Surrey printing the census at the archives.

For a surname, it is similar, and many genealogists working on a surname project start their data gathering with a census, building on a family group, over the decade. Although for my surname projects and One-Name Studies, I don’t start from a census, but with a marriage as I reconstruct families. I do use census returns, but not immediately. I have written before on this and you can read that post HERE, although I think I probably need to write on the topic again.

Over the coming days I am going to meander through the decades, with particular focus on the census returns, though the broad statement is, census material for 1801-1831 has limited value to family historians as there is not any specific individual data; and that in 1904, the records were largely destroyed, although a some examples have survived, as we shall see….